Hi! On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 09:42 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote: > thanks. However... the second, third and fourth links are not o.k. > They > all go to a 'massage therapy' site (the first link is o.k....) > > Could you update this? > <snip> > > > http://www.gardep.info/W3CWebContentAccessibilityGuidelines1_0ConformanceLogos-lithuanian.htm > > <http://www.gardep.info/> > > > http://www.gardep.info/LevelAConformancetoWebContentAccessibilityGuidelines1_0-lithuanian.htm > > <http://www.gardep.info/> > > > http://www.gardep.info/LevelDouble-AConformancetoWebContentAccessibilityGuidelines1_0-lithuanian.htm > > <http://www.gardep.info/> > > > http://www.gardep.info/LevelTriple-AConformancetoWebContentAccessibilityGuidelines1_0-lithuanian.htm > > <http://www.gardep.info/> I don't think the W3C should be linking to a shameful SPAM site like this. This kind of sites are destroying the Internet and are against everything the W3C stands for. Regards, -- Miguel SaturninoReceived on Monday, 24 July 2006 09:25:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:27:38 UTC