- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:37:49 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
bwm: [[ 16: Concepts Issues pfps-22, pfps-23: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0044.html pfps-16 (revised proposal): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0045.html williams-01 (revised proposal): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0107.html RDF fragment text, and revision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0093.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0123.html I'm a bit confused by the email traffic. Are there specific proposals for the WG to consider? ]] My position on these, and my understanding of the traffic, is that: pfps-22, pfps-23 - agreed as above, two minor questions outstanding: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0144.html pfps-16 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0045.html Judging by http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0162.html we are only considering part (3) of that msg against this issue. Part (1) is a change (delete s2.2.7) the editors have agreed as editorial. Part (2) I think now comes under williams-01 On part (3) I think Graham and I have reached the point of amicable disagreement. (I believe the WG decision is made, and these changes are about editorial execution of that decision) williams-01 (revised proposal): s3.1 as at very end of: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0161.html ( note that are other versions of the same text in that msg) s3.2 as in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0107.html with modification: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0180.html s2.2.6 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0045.html with modifications from: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0162.html (agreed editorial changes - no WG decision needed) RDF fragment text, and revision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0123.html although Patrick makes a case against this whole section Thus I believe telecon time can concentrate on pfps-16, pfps-22, pfps-23 Jeremy
Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 03:37:28 UTC