w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from October to December 2003 by date

Monday, 22 December 2003

• Re: XML DSig Canonicalization Oddities Joseph Reagle
• XML DSig Canonicalization Oddities Anders Rundgren
• The Worlds Greatest Vitamin! Medical Research

Friday, 19 December 2003

• RFC 3653 on XML-Signature XPath Filter 2.0 Donald Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 17 December 2003

• Link from translation site John Snow

Tuesday, 16 December 2003

• Re: Validating "profiled" XML DSig Joseph Reagle
• Validating "profiled" XML DSig Anders Rundgren
• AW: [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> Gregor Karlinger

Saturday, 13 December 2003

• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> Deepak K M

Friday, 12 December 2003

• CREA: implementation of XML signature Andrej Gustin

Sunday, 7 December 2003

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-xc14n-02.txt (fwd) Donald Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 3 December 2003

• New XMLSig implementation for Windows OS A. Jerman Blazic

Tuesday, 2 December 2003

• Model ships ......diferent conception.....beautiful ! mario zuker

Saturday, 29 November 2003

• Relentless Press Release Relentless Records

Wednesday, 26 November 2003

• Re: xmlsec library Aleksey Sanin
• xmlsec library Joseph Swaminathan

Tuesday, 25 November 2003

• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Jose Kahan

Monday, 24 November 2003

• RE: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML John Boyer
• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Jose Kahan

Thursday, 20 November 2003

• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Joseph Reagle
• IPsmarx Technologies Inc. Canada IPsmarx Technologies
• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Jose Kahan
• Re: ds:RetrievalMethod/@URI optional or mandatory? Jose Kahan

Tuesday, 18 November 2003

• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Joseph Reagle
• Re: ds:RetrievalMethod/@URI optional or mandatory? Joseph Reagle
• Re: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order Jose Kahan
• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Jose Kahan

Monday, 17 November 2003

• ds:RetrievalMethod/@URI optional or mandatory? Martin Gudgin

Thursday, 13 November 2003

• Re: AW: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Joseph Reagle
• AW: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Gregor Karlinger

Wednesday, 12 November 2003

• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Joseph Reagle
• Re: Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Rich Salz
• Erratum in Exclusive Canonical XML Gregor Karlinger

Tuesday, 11 November 2003

• Re: ds:RetrievalMethod/@URI optional or mandatory? Joseph Reagle

Monday, 10 November 2003

• ds:RetrievalMethod/@URI optional or mandatory? Martin Gudgin

Sunday, 9 November 2003

• frames sales@photoserve.net

Saturday, 8 November 2003

• batteries sales@photoserve.net
• batteries sales@photoserve.net

Thursday, 6 November 2003

• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Joseph Reagle
• Re: Exclusive XML Canonicalization 1.3(1) Errata? Donald Eastlake 3rd

Wednesday, 5 November 2003

• XML Digital Signature Creation Service Manoj K. Srivastava

Monday, 3 November 2003

• Re: How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? Anders Rundgren

Sunday, 2 November 2003

• RE: How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? John Boyer

Saturday, 1 November 2003

• Web (browser) PKI Standards - A study Anders Rundgren

Friday, 31 October 2003

• RE: How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? Brian LaMacchia

Monday, 27 October 2003

• Newbie:Question SecurityTokenReference tarun.matai@iflexsolutions.com
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• Multweb, caindo w3c-wai-rc
• re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ ylafon
• re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ reagle
• re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ dsr
• re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ ij

Thursday, 23 October 2003

• Interoperability event on XAdES Juan Carlos Cruellas Ibarz

Monday, 20 October 2003

• very urgent mariamxyz@tiscali.co.uk

Tuesday, 21 October 2003

• RIF: How much XML Signature is mature? Gino Tesei
• RIF: How much XML Signature is mature? Gino Tesei
• RIF: How much XML Signature is mature? Gino Tesei
• RIF: How much XML Signature is mature? Gino Tesei

Monday, 20 October 2003

• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Ed Simon
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Don Park

Sunday, 19 October 2003

• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Eugene Kuznetsov
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Rich Salz
• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Aleksey Sanin
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Don Park
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Don Park
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Rich Salz
• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Aleksey Sanin
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Don Park
• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Aleksey Sanin
• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Aleksey Sanin
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Don Park
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Rich Salz
• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Aleksey Sanin
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Don Park
• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Rich Salz

Saturday, 18 October 2003

• RE: How much XML Signature is mature? Don Park
• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Rich Salz

Friday, 17 October 2003

• Re: How much XML Signature is mature? Blake Dournaee
• Re: What is the best way to handle the case where you would end up with too many references in a digital signature? Blake Dournaee
• How much XML Signature is mature? Gino Tesei

Thursday, 16 October 2003

• RE: How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? John Boyer
• Re: What is the best way to handle the case where you would end up with too many references in a digital signature? Rich Salz
• RE: What is the best way to handle the case where you would end up with too many references in a digital signature? John Boyer
• Re: What is the best way to handle the case where you would end up with too many references in a digital signature? merlin
• RE: What is the best way to handle the case where you would end up with too many references in a digital signature? Chugh, Sanjay
• Re: What is the best way to handle the case where you would end up with too many references in a digital signature? Michael McIntosh
• What is the best way to handle the case where you would end up with too many references in a digital signature? Chugh, Sanjay
• RE: Calculating the DigestValue over an Object URI John

Wednesday, 15 October 2003

• RE: Calculating the DigestValue over an Object URI John Boyer
• RE: Calculating the DigestValue over an Object URI Patrick Rene Guillemin
• Calculating the DigestValue over an Object URI John
• RE: How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? jmessing

Tuesday, 14 October 2003

• RE: How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? John Boyer

Saturday, 11 October 2003

• Re: How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? jmessing
• How secure is Infopath? Was RE: How secure is XForms? John Boyer

Thursday, 9 October 2003

• XAdES interop tests Peter Lipp
• Exclusive XML Canonicalization 1.3(1) Errata? Donald Eastlake 3rd

Friday, 3 October 2003

• Re: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order Rich Salz

Thursday, 2 October 2003

• Re: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order Jose Kahan

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• Re: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order Ed Simon
• RE: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order John Boyer
• Re: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order Aleksey Sanin
• Re: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order Rich Salz
• RE: C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order John Boyer
• C14N: default namespace local name and sorting order Aleksey Sanin

Last message date: Monday, 22 December 2003 14:56:02 UTC