- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:02:07 +0200
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
Am 02.09.2010 15:53, schrieb Martin Hepp: > Hi Bob, > yes, of course I use the proper language tag for the labels. However, > given the state of tooling and typical workflows, the choice of the > identifiers is still critical, because > - RDFa coders will always use the identifiers and likely never see the > labels > - the navigation in the ontology documentation is typically based on the > identifiers, not the labels. > > See http://purl.org/vso/ns > > In my ontology projects, I have so far refrained from providing > translations for the elements, because the effort for reliable, > high-quality translations is very high and the use is limited, given the > fact that English is widely understood among application developers in > the world. Well, the label can and should be used for the end user, and that's why differ from its identifier. That means, a developer is then able to directly re-use this label in his/her application. Cheers, Bob
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:02:58 UTC