W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language updated

From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:27:30 +0200
Message-Id: <DF2A1234-CBD6-450E-A47E-3B20DED0E9C8@bblfish.net>
Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "Semantic-Web@W3.Org Interest Group" <semantic-web@w3.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Ok. Forget the entailment bit. I don't see what harm it can do as a  
hint though.

That's how CWM interprets "=" by the way. And it's nice because  
otherwise you end up with a lot
of blank nodes in your documents when you serialise to RDF/XML, which  
is ugly. Yes, I know you're not meant to look
at RDF/XML, but people do, and they come to silly conclusions based  
on it.

On 3 Oct 2007, at 13:11, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On 3 Oct 2007, at 12:04, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> [snip]
>> It seems strange to build one entailment into the language and not
>> others.  Keep the synatx as syntax; have entailment done elsewhere.
> I cannot agree more. And I agree utterly.
> Even if you interpret it as a kind of syntactic sugar in that case  
> and not an entailment, then you are overloading the syntax in a way  
> that loses the one-to-one correspondence with the graph which is a  
> strongly useful fact about Turtle.
>> In particular, structured editors might well not want any such  
>> procesing
>> done.
> Indeed. And what Steve said too!

Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 11:27:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:03 UTC