- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:11:57 +0100
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: "Semantic-Web@W3.Org Interest Group" <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 3 Oct 2007, at 12:04, Seaborne, Andy wrote: [snip] > It seems strange to build one entailment into the language and not > others. Keep the synatx as syntax; have entailment done elsewhere. I cannot agree more. And I agree utterly. Even if you interpret it as a kind of syntactic sugar in that case and not an entailment, then you are overloading the syntax in a way that loses the one-to-one correspondence with the graph which is a strongly useful fact about Turtle. > In particular, structured editors might well not want any such > procesing > done. Indeed. And what Steve said too! Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 11:10:43 UTC