- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:09:08 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, semantic-web@w3.org, www-international@w3.org
If I have understood the disagreement here it is about what a processor is and when the conversion discussed in XML Base actually happens. >From the previous messages I have understood that the PER has (will have?) clarified that the processor being discussed is one that is actually doing a GET on the IRI, and that the base-uri property used over the infoset is not a URI but an IRI. The fact that the clarification is needed indicates that both readings of the current spec are plausible. The RDF Test Cases include the example that Dave previously pointed to, to indicate that RDF Core impose the 'as late as possible' reading onto XML Base, at least for RDF/XML (perhaps - I haven't followed all the links) Jeremy Sandro Hawke wrote: > ... >> XML Base, however, does not use the notion of IRI. An implementation >> of XML Base must behave as if it converted the xml:base attribute >> value to a URI by expanding a subset of the %-escapes, and then >> did resolution in accordance with RFC 3986 (not 3987). > ... > > I don't think I agree, but maybe I misunderstand. Here's a first pass > at a test case: > > =========================== Input ============================== > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" > xml:base="http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/JP納豆/引き割り納��"> > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/"> > <foaf:likes rdf:resource="" /> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> > ================================================================ > > ** Option 1: > > This is perfectly decent XML. It parses to this N-Triple: > > <http://www.w3.org/> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/likes> <http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/JP納豆/引き割り納��>. > > I'm happy with this option, and I understood Jeremy and Chris to be as > well. FWIW, the W3C RDF validator (using Jeremy's parser) does this. > > ** Option 2: > > This input is not well formed XML. > > ... Are there any other options? John, can you explain your > interpretation in these terms? > > -- Sandro -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 10:09:34 UTC