On Thursday, April 19, 2007, 5:14:49 PM, John wrote: JC> Note: I'm a member of the XML Core WG, which owns the XML Base spec, JC> and I may speak in accordance with my best recollection of things JC> discussed there when making statements about intentions. However, JC> I don't speak for the WG. And I am equally drawing on recollections of a working lunch at the Tech Plenary, with Paul Grosso and others, where the notion that the infoset property for the base URI 'represented a URI' rather than 'contained a URI' and thus, was compatible with IRIs, was discussed. I agree that the term IRI is a more recent coinage than many of the specifications which allowed a wider range of non-ASCII characters to 'represent URIs' after escaping. I disagree with your assertion that simply using XML Base (without dereferencing) forces a hexification. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Friday, 20 April 2007 17:30:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:00 UTC