- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:37:49 -0400
- To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, semantic-web@w3.org, www-international@w3.org
...
> XML Base, however, does not use the notion of IRI. An implementation
> of XML Base must behave as if it converted the xml:base attribute
> value to a URI by expanding a subset of the %-escapes, and then
> did resolution in accordance with RFC 3986 (not 3987).
...
I don't think I agree, but maybe I misunderstand. Here's a first pass
at a test case:
=========================== Input ==============================
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xml:base="http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/JP納豆/引き割り納��">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/">
<foaf:likes rdf:resource="" />
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
================================================================
** Option 1:
This is perfectly decent XML. It parses to this N-Triple:
<http://www.w3.org/> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/likes> <http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/JP納豆/引き割り納��>.
I'm happy with this option, and I understood Jeremy and Chris to be as
well. FWIW, the W3C RDF validator (using Jeremy's parser) does this.
** Option 2:
This input is not well formed XML.
... Are there any other options? John, can you explain your
interpretation in these terms?
-- Sandro
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 18:38:42 UTC