- From: Martin Honnen <martin.honnen@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 12:41:06 +0200
- To: public-xslt-40@w3.org
Am 9/21/2022 um 12:13 PM schrieb Mukul Gandhi: > I've been thinking about this since, a long time, and now I'm quite > sure how I feel about this. > > I think, the XSLT spec (taking ideas from XSLT 3.0) should remove > streaming/performance related recommendations from the main body of > the spec, and move that to a separate document (likely as a normative > annexure of the main XSLT spec, or as a normative WG note linked from > the main XSLT spec). > > I feel that, having streaming/performance related recommendations > specified within the main body of XSLT spec, is a major impediment for > XSLT 3.0's adoption. > Adoption by whom? Implementors? Users? Saxonica has implemented streaming, the main other vendor Altova has decided not to implement it. Do you expect more XSLT 3 implementations if the optional feature streaming is part of a separate document? And users probably don't start by reading the spec, although it has introductory sections on streaming as well.
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2022 10:41:17 UTC