- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:13:32 +0530
- To: Martin Honnen <martin.honnen@gmx.de>
- Cc: public-xslt-40@w3.org
Hi Martin, On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 4:11 PM Martin Honnen <martin.honnen@gmx.de> wrote: > Adoption by whom? Implementors? Users? I mean, adoption by users. > Saxonica has implemented streaming, the main other vendor Altova has > decided not to implement it. Do you expect more XSLT 3 implementations > if the optional feature streaming is part of a separate document? I'm not sure about that. But binding a significant performance/streaming related requirement (which is non trivial. In the case of XSLT 3.0, using streaming is not possible with the entire XSLT 3.0 language, but only subset of it, doesn't sound great), with the main body of the language, tends to discourage implementers from implementing that. Having more than, one implementor for each and every XSLT 3.0 language feature, shall generally be good. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2022 11:44:02 UTC