Tuesday, 29 June 2010
- RE: How to deal with null references?
- ACTION-597 summary
- RE: How to deal with null references?
- RE: C14N2.0: ugly little details
- ISSUE-208: List 2.0 algorithms in algorithms cross-reference
- ISSUE-207: Update wording of best practice in 2.2.2 since empty result could be intentional, e.g. sign element even if missing. text to modify "In this case there is XPath transform, which evaluates to zero or false for every node, so it ends up selecting nothing. So even though the signature seems to sign the Approval, it actually doesn't. The application should reject this document."
- RE: C14N2.0: ugly little details
- RE: CURIEs / QNames
- Re: C14N2.0: ugly little details
- Re: CURIEs / QNames
- C14N2.0: ugly little details
- Re: Syntax for C14N2.0 profiles
Monday, 28 June 2010
- RE: Syntax for C14N2.0 profiles
- RE: XMLSig 1.1 support in Apache C++ impl
- Syntax for C14N2.0 profiles
- XMLSig 1.1 support in Apache C++ impl
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-06-29
- CR published: Digital Signatures for Widgets
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
- Re: ACTION-574: proposal on prefix rewriting
- RE: ACTION-574: proposal on prefix rewriting
- RE: ACTION-574: proposal on prefix rewriting
- RE: ACTION-580: Removing c14n2.0 options ignoreDTD and expandEntities
- RE: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag
- RE: ACTION-561: URIs for XML and EXI serializations in c14n2
- RE: ACTION-574: proposal on prefix rewriting
- ISSUE-206: For c14n20 profile - clarify that conformance implies support, but also changes to xml or what must be explicitly specififed
- RE: Object tag in Dsig 2.0
- RE: Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-06-22
- RE: CURIEs / QNames
Monday, 21 June 2010
- RE: Confirming LC-2390 resolution - ECPointType schema comment
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-06-22
- Confirming LC-2390 resolution - ECPointType schema comment
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
- Re: CURIEs / QNames
- Updated XML Signature 1.1 for formatting, 1.1 and 2.0 for URN to URI change in text.
- CURIEs / QNames
- ISSUE-205: Entity expansion risks associated with signature processing
Monday, 14 June 2010
- RE: Last call comment on XML Sig 1.1 schema
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-06-15 (v2)
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-06-15
- Updated roadmap to include XPath profile
- RE: Last call comment on XML Sig 1.1 schema
- Updated XML Encryption 1.1 to resolve LC-2386
- Re: Last call comment on XML Sig 1.1
- Re: Last call comment on XML Sig 1.1 schema
Friday, 11 June 2010
Thursday, 10 June 2010
- RE: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag
- RE: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag
- Re: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag
- ACTION-549: Handling of arbitrary QName content in c14n 2.0
Tuesday, 8 June 2010
Monday, 7 June 2010
- RE: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag
- Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag
- RE: ACTION-580: Removing c14n2.0 options ignoreDTD and expandEntities
- Removing c14n2.0 options ignoreDTD and expandEntities
- RE: ACTION-543: Make proposals for the last two points noted in ISSUE-43 comments
Friday, 4 June 2010
- Re: Object tag in Dsig 2.0
- RE: Object tag in Dsig 2.0
- Reminder: Deadline for Position Papers for Privacy Workshop is this Monday, 7 June
Wednesday, 2 June 2010
Tuesday, 1 June 2010
- RE: Object tag in Dsig 2.0
- RE: ACTION-543: Make proposals for the last two points noted in ISSUE-43 comments
- No meeting next week - 8 June 2010 meeting cancelled
- RE: ACTION-543: Make proposals for the last two points noted in ISSUE-43 comments
- Object tag in Dsig 2.0
- Proposal for LC-2387
- Proposed resolution for LC-2386
- Re: ACTION-578: External unparsed entities in Best Practices
- [ACTION-559] Investigate schema vs. DTD wrt entities