- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:28:13 +0200
- To: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
On 15 Jun 2010, at 19:55, Scott Cantor wrote: > Thomas, I'm assuming this is the spec you were referring to? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/curie/ > > I reviewed it briefly and I guess my reaction is that it seems to be > proposing something that's very much like QNames (in that it has the prefix > problem), but is definitely formally distinct. Mostly; also: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xhtml-rdfa-20100422/ Note the prefix construct and the continued reliance on CURIES. It would be great if you could have a quick look at how this affects c14n 2.0. (I suppose that takes care of ACTION-595, in fact.)
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2010 21:28:18 UTC