- From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:07:01 +0000
- To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Hi Scott, Actually I would like for us not to change the schema here; the reason is that for the other usages of CryptoBinary related to ECC that you mention, the underlying value is just a simple type: An octet string or a seed value, etc. Here, we have an in-built structure and having an abstraction makes sense. Best, -- Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Scott Cantor > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:01 AM > To: public-xmlsec@w3.org > Subject: Last call comment on XML Sig 1.1 schema > > Just reviewing the schema and noted there's a redundancy: > > <simpleType name="ECPointType"> > <restriction base="ds:CryptoBinary"/> > </simpleType> > > Other places in the EC key syntax schema just use CryptoBinary directly, so I'd > suggest removing that type definition and > s/dsig11:ECPointType/ds:CryptoBinary for consistency. > > This shouldn't affect any implementations at this point. > > -- Scott > > >
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 18:07:36 UTC