- From: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
I have updated the C14N spec with this proposal. http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/ June 22, 2010 This should close my ACTION-596 Pratik -----Original Message----- From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:57 PM To: Pratik Datta; XMLSec WG Public List Subject: RE: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag > I remember that we had discussed this, but did we agree on this proposal ? I think Thomas had expressed a concern about whether we needed to bother exposing all of the backward compatibility options, and that it was better to define just "the right things" for 2.0. -- Scott
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 17:18:15 UTC