Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 October 13

/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say:
[...]
| 7. xml:id.
|
| Norm has collected the xml:id issues, now (public) at:
| http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/wd-status/status-report.html
|
| ACTION to Norm:  Please add $Date $ to the CVS line at the top.

Done.

| The latest draft (2004 August 24) is at
| http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html
|
| ID Strictness 
| -------------
|
| We have CONSENSUS on the following:
|
| * Processors MUST check that xml:id values are valid NCNames.
|
| * It is an xml:id error for xml:id values to not be unique.
|
| ACTION to Norm:  Produce another WG WD reflecting this and our
| other decisions.
|
| No mention of [references] Infoset property 
| -------------------------------------------
| Conclusion:  We'd like a motherhood note that suggests that
| the [references] Infoset property should be correct for things
| recognized by xml:id.
|
| xml:id and fragment identifiers 
| -------------------------------
| We have CONSENSUS that we don't need to say anything here.
| We could add another motherhood note here.

It doesn't look like I'll have another draft today.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.