- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:21:49 -0400
- To: "Glenn Marcy" <gmarcy@us.ibm.com>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F13E1BF26B19BA40AF3C0DE7D4DA0C03E490FA@ati-mail01.arbortext.local>
Nit on nit: actually, the comma should be added where it's missing. A comma should precede a conjunction separating independent clauses: declaration matches ..., and content consists .... paul ________________________________ From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Marcy Sent: Tuesday, 12 October, 2004 14:15 To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 October 13 > We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, > Ocotber 13, from I have a meeting before the call that has a good chance of running over time, so I'm sending regrets in case it runs way over, otherwise I'll just be late to the call. > ACTION to Glenn: Propose corrected wording in email. The declaration matches Mixed and the content (after replacing any entity references with their replacement text) consists of character data<add>, including CDATA sections</add>, comments, PIs and child elements whose types match names in the content model. The declaration matches ANY<del>,</del> and the content (after replacing any entity references with their replacement text) consists of character data<add>, including CDATA sections, comments, PIs</add> and child elements whose types have been declared. Nit: I added the change to strike the comma after ANY since it is inconsistent with the other text in the same constraint. Regards, Glenn
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 19:24:29 UTC