Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2004 October 13

We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, 
Ocotber 13, from
          08:00-09:00 Pacific time aka
          11:00-12:00 Eastern time aka
          15:00-16:00 UTC
          16:00-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
          17:00-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .

See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.

Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.

Daniel and François give probable regrets.

Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
   the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
   or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).


2. Miscellaneous administrivia.

The next W3C Technical Plenary Week will be 28 February 2005
through 4 March 2005:
     http://www.w3.org/2002/09/TPOverview.html

The meeting will be held in the Hyatt Harborside, Boston:
     http://harborside.hyatt.com/property/index.jhtml


3. Problem with xml:space in the Schema document for the XML namespace

Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org> sent us email on this at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Jul/0019

CONSENSUS to remove the default for xml:space from the schema
for the xml namespace.

ACTION to Henry:  Draft a new schema and send it to the XML Core list.


4. XML errata.  The published 1.0 errata document is [8], the
   published 1.1 errata document is [9], and the NEW PUBLIC
   Potential Errata (PE) document is [7]. 

Glenn has raised a question at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Sep/0080
about the wording for the ANY and mixed content models and whether
they allow cdata sections and/or comments and PIs.

All on the phone (and Francois in previous email) agree that we meant
to allows cdata sections and PIs and comments in these models.

ACTION to Glenn:  Propose corrected wording in email.

ACTION to François:  Make this a PE.


5. Namespaces in XML.

  ACTION to Richard:  Produce a draft for NS1.0 2nd Ed.


6. Xinclude PR was published Sept 30 at:
   http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-xinclude-20040930/
   and announced to the AC at
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2004JulSep/0043 

   Please be sure your AC reps vote on it by October 29.

Sandra has added ERH's test to the XInclude Test Suite.

ACTION to Henry:  Update the XInclude Test Suite with Sandra's files,
sent to us in private email headed:

	From: Sandra Martinez [mailto:sandra.martinez@nist.gov] 
	Sent: Thursday, 2004 September 30 12:37
	To: Paul Grosso
	Cc: Henry S. Thompson
	Subject: RE: XInclude Test Report

	Attached are the archive files and the report that contains
	Elliotte's tests.
	. . .

Elliotte has another test to send us too.


7. xml:id.

Norm has collected the xml:id issues, now (public) at:
http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/xml-id/wd-status/status-report.html

ACTION to Norm:  Please add $Date $ to the CVS line at the top.

The latest draft (2004 August 24) is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xmlid/xml-id.html

ID Strictness 
-------------

We have CONSENSUS on the following:

* Processors MUST check that xml:id values are valid NCNames.

* It is an xml:id error for xml:id values to not be unique.

ACTION to Norm:  Produce another WG WD reflecting this and our
other decisions.

No mention of [references] Infoset property 
-------------------------------------------
Conclusion:  We'd like a motherhood note that suggests that
the [references] Infoset property should be correct for things
recognized by xml:id.

xml:id and fragment identifiers 
-------------------------------
We have CONSENSUS that we don't need to say anything here.
We could add another motherhood note here.


8.  XML Profile.  The TAG (via Norm) asks about progress on this:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Sep/0004



[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2004Oct/0001
[7]
http://www.w3.org/XML/2004/02/proposed-xml10-3e-and-xml11-errata.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata
[9] http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V11-1e-errata

Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 14:07:40 UTC