- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:35:37 +0200
- To: peter williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- Cc: jeff@sayremedia.com, public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 28 April 2011 17:53, peter williams <home_pw@msn.com> wrote: > I begged for a rewriting on that particular point, and you guys did it. > Thanks. I don't have much reputation to preserve in openid-land, but what > there is was not disaparaged. I can go there, still stare at the floor, but > at least I can be in the room. > > Despite the toning down, the underlying orientation of the group still came > through - wanting to define webid in terms of the "original sin" of foaf not > being adopted by the openid community (per some founder ideas, apparently). > Folks have not moved on. The original sin has become a prayer; and an > institutionalized ceremony to remind the faithful. Anyone in the know can > hear the refrain. I hear it, and so do others. > > We don't want a new submission. We have to live with our flaws, once made. [coming back to my mailbox after a while offline today] Yes, I don't think a resubmission is needed, just that anyone attending the workshop or interacting elsewhere approaches things with tone in mind. cheers, Dan
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 17:36:04 UTC