- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:02:54 -0400
- To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Cc: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:03:45PM +0100, Jodi Schneider wrote: > > -- "Though in principle extensible, the microdata schemas would require a > > lot of extension..."? Was the more cryptic: "Though _it_ is in principle > > extensible _it_ would require..." > > I find the "though in principle extensible" confusing here, since it precedes > the subject of the sentence (the microdata schemas). > > So I'd prefer something like: > > Although they are, in principle, extensible, microdata schemes would need to > be heavily extended in order to express library information since most of the > required vocabulary is lacking. > > or > > Microdata schemes, while in principle extensible, would require a lot of > extension for use in expressing library information since most of the > required vocabulary is lacking. > > or > > Although in principle they are extensible, microdata schemes would need to be > heavily extended in order to express library information since most of the > required vocabulary is lacking. All three are better than (though consistent with) what I proposed, especially the third. Will you make the change? Tom
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 18:03:35 UTC