- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:04:05 -0400
- To: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:02:54PM -0400, Thomas Baker wrote: > > Although in principle they are extensible, microdata schemes would need to be > > heavily extended in order to express library information since most of the > > required vocabulary is lacking. > > All three are better than (though consistent with) what I proposed, especially > the third. Will you make the change? DONE - see [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Relevant_Technologies&diff=6204&oldid=6184
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 20:04:40 UTC