- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:32:50 +0200
- To: SAWSDL public list <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/13. Dial-in information (member-only) [1] Zakim instructions [2] [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-semann/2006Jun/0006 [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim ---------------------------------------- 1. Call setup - Scribe list: JBD, JL, CB, JF, RA, MK, JH, BP, LH, TV, NG, TP, CP, CV, LF, HL, EP, BNS, AS - Regrets: CV, LF - Any modifications to agenda? - Especially reordering of issues to be discussed - Any other business? ---------------------------------------- 2. Approval of minutes - Minutes of last meeting [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20060606 ---------------------------------------- 3. Action Item Review - Action item list [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/#Actions 2006-05-23: Terry to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July 2006-05-23: EricP to review last call of WSDL RDF mapping http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf/ by beginning of July - ongoing, with time to spare 2006-06-06: JacekK to open 2 issues: relation of multiple model references (1) and annotationContext (2) - done, issues 17 and 18 in [2] 2006-06-06: LaurentH to specify use cases for separating different annotations (for example optimizations) into different contexts/perspectives - ongoing? 2006-06-06: JohnMiller to propose a specific RDFS ontology for interface categories - ongoing? [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/ ---------------------------------------- 4. Administrivia - Face-to-face logistics page [1] - Registration closed now - Proposed agenda will be posted soon [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/admin/meetings/200606Galway ---------------------------------------- 5. Relation of multiple modelReferences [1] - Implicit conjunction, no other relationship? [2] - What do we do about conflicting annotations? [3] - Can we add a general statement about inconsistencies resulting in invalid SA-WSDL documents? [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x18 [2] (?) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0043 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0038 ---------------------------------------- 6. Clarification of SchemaMapping concept [1] - Summary of what schemaMapping may mean [2] - Resolved 2006-06-06 that it transforms data - Direction of transformation (XML<->RDF) - Both necessary? - upCast and downCast (lifting and lowering?) - Where can schemaMapping be attached? [3] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x6 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0039 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0018 ---------------------------------------- 7. should mappings be bijections? [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x16 ---------------------------------------- 8. why distinguish between basic and complex types? [1] - Laurent's suggestion for annotating complex elements where used [2] - Are there any reason for disallowing any kind of annotation on simple or complex types/elements [3]? Can we simply "not distinguish"? - Do the leaf-level annotations imply the container-level relationship? [4] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x11 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0043 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0007 [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0009 ---------------------------------------- 9. Combining multiple modelReferences and schemaMappings [1] - depends on resolution to issues 6, 18 - what is the relationship between modelReference and schemaMapping? [3] - we may need the notion of a pair <modelReference/schemaMapping> [2] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x7 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0017 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006Jun/0021 ---------------------------------------- 10. Conflict Resolution Rules [1] - See also thread [2], esp. regarding relation to other issues [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x8 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0022 ---------------------------------------- 11. modelReference vs. category [1] - proposal to replace category with modelReference - adding a small RDFS ontology for category modeling - waiting for completion of John Miller's action item [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x10 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0059 ---------------------------------------- 12. Do we need annotationContext? [1] - Justification for annotationContext? - Laurent's proposal [2] - introduce annotationContext with id+author+version+date - put modelReference into one context - multiple schemaMappings within modelReference - Problem with XML Schema element extensibility [4] - waiting for completion of Laurent's action item [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x17 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0044 [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-semann/2006May/0058 ---------------------------------------- 13. schemaMapping languages in appendix? [1] - Any details on possible mapping languages (including examples) should be out in an appendix. - Should we plan an appendix (or a few) with details of support for specific mapping languages? Which ones? - XSLT - XQuery - Others? [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x14 ---------------------------------------- 14. WSDL 1.1 extensibility? [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x12 ---------------------------------------- 15. Interoperation between SAWSDL and UDDI [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x19 ---------------------------------------- 16. Using UDDI taxonomies as examples for interface categorization? [1] - Is it correctly categorized as editorial? [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x20
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 15:32:58 UTC