RE: new snapshots

Here are my review comments on the latest drafts of WS-Transfer, WS-Enumeration, and WS-Eventing. I am yet to review MEX and RT. Thanks.

WS-Transfer

Should the specification use WS-Fragment or WS-Fragments?

The change is highlighted in red.

[Body] /wst:Delete@Dialect="http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag"

The WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments]<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst-diff.html#WsFrag> specification defines this dialect URI. Use of this URI indicates that the contents of the Get element MUST be processed as specified by the WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments]<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst-diff.html#WsFrag> specification.
The above  comment applies for the descriptions of the following attributes as well.

[Body] /wst:Put@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag
[Body] /wst:Create@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag

WS-Enumeration

The phrase "returning the EnumerateResponse. message." has a extra full stop after EnumerateResponse.

WS-Transfer

Looks good.



-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Lafon
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 7:02 AM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: new snapshots



See

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html



and the diffs from the june snapshots:

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt-diff.html

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html



--

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.



         ~~Yves