- From: Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:11:58 -0700
- To: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4A8AD2CE.20408@oracle.com>
Ram, Can you share your motivations for the additional sentence? I can't quite work out what problem you are trying to address. - gp On 8/17/2009 12:14 PM, Ram Jeyaraman wrote: > > I like to suggest a minor revision the proposed text. The changes > relative to the existing wording in the specifications is highlighted > below:. Thanks. > > > > The elements defined in this specification MAY be extended at the > points indicated by their outlines and schema. Implementations MAY add > child elements and/or attributes at the > > indicated extension points but MUST NOT contradict the semantics of > the parent and/or owner, respectively. If a receiver does not > recognize an extension, the receiver SHOULD > > ignore that extension. Senders MAY indicate the presence of an > extension that has to be understood through the use of a corresponding > SOAP Header with a soap:mustUnderstand > > attribute with the value "1". In cases where it is either desirable or > necessary for the receiver of a request that has been extended to > indicate that it has recognized and accepted the semantics associated > with that extension, it is recommended that the receiver add a > corresponding extension to the response message. The definition of an > extension should clearly specify how the extension that appears in the > response correlates with that in the corresponding request. > > > > *From:* public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of > *Gilbert Pilz > *Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2009 2:46 PM > *To:* public-ws-resource-access@w3.org > *Subject:* AI 96/Issue 7206: addition to generic extensibility section > that advises on the use of response extensions > > > > Attached is our generic "Considerations on the Use of Extensibility > Points" section with an additional sentence that advises on the use of > a response extensions to indicate recognition and acceptance of > request extensions. > > - gp >
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:13:03 UTC