RE: new snapshots

My review comments on MEX and WS-ResourceTransfer. This completes my review. Thanks.


Issue resolution states the following part:



  <mex:GetMetadataResponse ..>

      <mex:Metadata ...>



      xs:any *


The latest draft of the MEX specification states


   <mex:Metadata ...>



I believe the xs:any inside the <mex:Metadata> is extraneous.


Looks good.

From: [] On Behalf Of Ram Jeyaraman
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:09 PM
To: Yves Lafon;
Subject: RE: new snapshots

Here are my review comments on the latest drafts of WS-Transfer, WS-Enumeration, and WS-Eventing. I am yet to review MEX and RT. Thanks.


Should the specification use WS-Fragment or WS-Fragments?

The change is highlighted in red.

[Body] /wst:Delete@Dialect=""

The WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments]<> specification defines this dialect URI. Use of this URI indicates that the contents of the Get element MUST be processed as specified by the WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments]<> specification.
The above  comment applies for the descriptions of the following attributes as well.

[Body] /wst:Put@Dialect=
[Body] /wst:Create@Dialect=


The phrase "returning the EnumerateResponse. message." has a extra full stop after EnumerateResponse.


Looks good.

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Yves Lafon
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 7:02 AM
Subject: new snapshots


and the diffs from the june snapshots:


Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.


Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:12:09 UTC