- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:21:25 -0400
- To: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF0EB15F25.91A81406-ON85257616.006A3240-85257616.006A55B2@us.ibm.com>
for now I made WS-Transfer match the ws-frag spec - and used
"WS-Fragment".
Although, I think Fragments sounds better - we should discuss on the call.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog.
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
08/18/2009 03:08 PM
To
Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org"
<public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>
cc
Subject
RE: new snapshots
Here are my review comments on the latest drafts of WS-Transfer,
WS-Enumeration, and WS-Eventing. I am yet to review MEX and RT. Thanks.
WS-Transfer
Should the specification use WS-Fragment or WS-Fragments?
The change is highlighted in red.
[Body] /wst:Delete@Dialect="http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag"
The WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments] specification defines this dialect URI. Use
of this URI indicates that the contents of the Get element MUST be
processed as specified by the WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments] specification.
The above comment applies for the descriptions of the following
attributes as well.
[Body] /wst:Put@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag
[Body] /wst:Create@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag
WS-Enumeration
The phrase ?returning the EnumerateResponse. message.? has a extra full
stop after EnumerateResponse.
WS-Transfer
Looks good.
-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Lafon
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 7:02 AM
To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org
Subject: new snapshots
See
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html
and the diffs from the june snapshots:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum-diff.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing-diff.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex-diff.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt-diff.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:22:15 UTC