- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:21:25 -0400
- To: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org>, public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF0EB15F25.91A81406-ON85257616.006A3240-85257616.006A55B2@us.ibm.com>
for now I made WS-Transfer match the ws-frag spec - and used "WS-Fragment". Although, I think Fragments sounds better - we should discuss on the call. thanks -Doug ______________________________________________________ STSM | Standards Architect | IBM Software Group (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog. Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com> Sent by: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org 08/18/2009 03:08 PM To Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, "public-ws-resource-access@w3.org" <public-ws-resource-access@w3.org> cc Subject RE: new snapshots Here are my review comments on the latest drafts of WS-Transfer, WS-Enumeration, and WS-Eventing. I am yet to review MEX and RT. Thanks. WS-Transfer Should the specification use WS-Fragment or WS-Fragments? The change is highlighted in red. [Body] /wst:Delete@Dialect="http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag" The WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments] specification defines this dialect URI. Use of this URI indicates that the contents of the Get element MUST be processed as specified by the WS-Fragment [WS-Fragments] specification. The above comment applies for the descriptions of the following attributes as well. [Body] /wst:Put@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag [Body] /wst:Create@Dialect=http://www.w3.org/2009/02/ws-frag WS-Enumeration The phrase ?returning the EnumerateResponse. message.? has a extra full stop after EnumerateResponse. WS-Transfer Looks good. -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-resource-access-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Lafon Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 7:02 AM To: public-ws-resource-access@w3.org Subject: new snapshots See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html and the diffs from the june snapshots: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsenum-diff.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wseventing-diff.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsmex-diff.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wsrt-diff.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/snapshots/20090724/wst.html -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:22:15 UTC