- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:11:53 -0400
- To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9217C65C.D0BE736A-ON852571AE.00639983-852571AE.0063F497@us.ibm.com>
All, I've taken the liberty of compiling a list of new issues raised to date (below). Given that we have yet to make a final determination as to the means of tracking issues, it would greatly assist the chairs if, in addition to submitting new issues to the list, that those of you who do so, also track the subject line and the relevant link to the issue in the email archive as I have done, for each of your submitted issues as this will help Paul and I in compiling the list for next week's telcon (and also ensure that we don't miss any). New issues as of: 14 July 2006: NEW ISSUE: framework and domain specific policy assertions-- clarification of division of concerns in the Introductory sentence http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0049.html NEW ISSUE: Modify wording in 1.1 Introduction for Framework document http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0048.html NEW ISSUE: Clarify "Framework" in Introduction http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0046.html NEW ISSUE: Clarify the relation of overlapping definitions in the framework / in the attachement document http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0045.html NEW ISSUE: Modify wording in Abstract for Framework document http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0042.html NEW ISSUE: WSDL 2.0 status recorded in Attachments 1.5 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0041.html NEW ISSUE: section 1.1 Goals section, rewording http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0033.html NEW ISSUE: Confusing use of "policy expression" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0031.html NEW ISSUE: Semantics of successful intersection determined by domain-specific assertion content http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0029.html NEW ISSUE: Change Reference from RFC 3986 to RFC 3987 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0028.html NEW ISSUE: Require assertions to be distinguished from parameter elements http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0022.html NEW ISSUE: Policy Negotiation http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0017.html NEW ISSUE: Normalization should make empty nested policy elements equivalent to policy statements without nested policy element http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0013.html NEW ISSUE: Namespace URI for W3C WS-Policy http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Jul/0008.html Thanks, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440 phone: +1 508 377 9295
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 18:14:13 UTC