public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org from April 2005 by author

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Part 1 typos (Monday, 18 April)

David Booth

• Another part 1 typo (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: LC115: a WSDL whatsit? (conformance terminology) (Monday, 18 April)
• Part 1 typos (Monday, 18 April)
• Part 2 editorial issue: "binding" versus "binding extension" (Monday, 18 April)
• Editorial: Ambiguous use of the terms "include" and "import" (Thursday, 14 April)
• Misc Part1 editorial issues (Monday, 4 April)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: XMLP Review of WSDL 2.0 Part 2 LC WD (Saturday, 30 April)
• re; Editorial: Typo in Section 3.7.3 Part 2 - HTTP Fault (Friday, 29 April)
• FW: HTTP binding's MEP use description (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Editorial: missing antecedent (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Editorial: more .. schema vs. schema document (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Editorial: schema vs. schema document (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Editorial: imported schema vs. namespace (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: typo (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Part 2 editorial comment (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Editorial last call review comments (Friday, 29 April)
• FW: Issue: missing "type" attribute in schema for wsdl:binding (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Part 1 editorial comments (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: QA Review on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, Editorial comments (Friday, 29 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 April 2005 00:09:20 UTC