RE: Editorial: missing antecedent

Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in
resolving it.  We tracked the comment below as Issue LC68 [1].  The
editors have addressed the editorial matters you highlight below in
their latest drafts [2].

If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to
acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are
satisfied.  The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in
the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:public-ws-desc-
>] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 5:59 AM
> To:
> Subject: Editorial: missing antecedent
> [On behalf of the XML Schema WG]
> "XML Schema MAY be used as the schema language via import or
> embedding. Each
> method defines a different element information item for use within a
> types
> element information item." -
> The antecedent for the phrase 'each method' is missing. Also, what
> does it
> mean?
> On behalf of the XML Schema WG,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com

Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 23:22:06 UTC