- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:22:03 -0700
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in resolving it. We tracked the comment below as Issue LC68 [1]. The editors have addressed the editorial matters you highlight below in their latest drafts [2]. If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are satisfied. The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC68 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 5:59 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Editorial: missing antecedent > > > [On behalf of the XML Schema WG] > > "XML Schema MAY be used as the schema language via import or > embedding. Each > method defines a different element information item for use within a > types > element information item." - > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#xsd-types > > The antecedent for the phrase 'each method' is missing. Also, what > does it > mean? > > On behalf of the XML Schema WG, > > Asir S Vedamuthu > asirv at webmethods dot com > http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 23:22:06 UTC