- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:05:19 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in resolving it. We tracked the comment below as Issue LC35 [1]. The editors have addressed the editorial matters you highlight below in their latest draft [2]. If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are satisfied. The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC35 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:58 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Part 1 editorial comments > > Below is a list of typos and editorial fixes I noted in Part 1: > - section 2: s/.e.g/e.g./. > - section 2.1.1: s/and that it resolve/and that it resolves/. > - section 2.4.2: s/such as > 'http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-only'/i.e. when > ''http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-only' is in use/; indeed, this > is the only possibility. > - section 2.4.2.1: s/AII/&AII;/ and s/be be/be/. > - section 2.4.3.4: s/whether the operation is safe or not/whether the > operation is declared to be safe or not/; indeed, safe='false' > doesn't mean that the operation isn't safe, but that it hasn't been > declared as such as per 2.4.1. > - section 2.5.1: s/wsdls:token/wsdls:Token/. > - section 2.6.2.1: s/fault attribute information item/ref attribute > information item/. > - section 2.7.1.1.1: the example is missing the WSDL default > namespace. > - section 10.1: I don't think that the RDF mapping is a normative > reference; it is an informative one. > - sections A and A.2: there are editor's notes remaining that should > be removed. > - section D.1: "This section will provide some rationale for it and > provide hints on how to work around some scenarios."; they are > missing. > > Regards, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 23:05:30 UTC