- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:16:37 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for the comment below, and for your patience with us in resolving it. We tracked the comment below as Issue LC39 [1]. The editors have addressed the editorial matters you highlight below in their latest drafts [2]. If you agree with our disposition of your comment, we'd like you to acknowledge it within two weeks; otherwise we will assume you are satisfied. The WG plans to enter a second (short) Last Call period in the near future, and we invite you to review that publication as well. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC39 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts. html > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 9:01 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: Part 2 editorial comment > > Section 3.2 says: > > This module is identified with the URI... > > I would suggest s/module/SOAP module/ as this isn't any kind of module > that is defined here, but a SOAP 1.2 module. > > Regards, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 29 April 2005 23:16:40 UTC