public-ws-chor@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• RE: Regrets Lipton, Paul C
• Regrets Yaron Goland
• RE: Re-submission of Requirements on Transactions Fletcher, Tony
• RE: Re-submission of Requirements on Transactions Fletcher, Tony

Monday, 29 September 2003

• Re: Re-submission of Requirements on Transactions Monica Martin
• Re: Re-submission of Requirements on Transactions Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
• Re-submission of Requirements on Transactions Fletcher, Tony

Friday, 26 September 2003

• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Steve Ross-Talbot
• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Monika Solanki

Sunday, 12 October 2003

• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Jianchao Wang
• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Wang Jianchao

Thursday, 25 September 2003

• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Chiusano Joseph
• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
• RE: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Katia Sycara
• A question of Composite Web Service Verification Wang Jianchao

Tuesday, 23 September 2003

• Contribution from Tony Fletcher, Choreology, on Business Transaction Management Requirements Fletcher, Tony
• A trial balloon distinction between choreography & orchestration Frank McCabe

Monday, 22 September 2003

• No Call this week Martin Chapman

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• DRAFT MINUTES FROM 9th Sept Conf Call Steve Ross-Talbot
• Fwd: Requirements actions list spreadsheet Steve Ross-Talbot
• Re: Interesting new article on recent demo from MSoft (primarily) Jon Dart
• Interesting new article on recent demo from MSoft (primarily) Steve Ross-Talbot

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• Requirements actions list spreadsheet Steve Ross Talbot
• FW: Choreography Specification Draft - oveview presentation Burdett, David
• Fwd: fyi Steve Ross-Talbot
• test - please ignore Trickovic, Ivana

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• Feedback on the Requirements document (v1.0) Trickovic, Ivana
• FW: Feedback on the Requirements document (v1.0) Liu, Kevin
• CSF analysis Take 2 Francis McCabe
• Use Case Proposal - Supporting the classifier-instance relationship in Web Services marcoadr@tin.it
• Use Case Proposal - Supporting the classifier-instance relationship in Web Services Marco Adragna
• Re: Correlation and the need for causality Assaf Arkin

Monday, 15 September 2003

• The spreadsheet for requirements Steve Ross-Talbot

Saturday, 13 September 2003

• RE: Contribution on Transaction Requirements from Choreology Martin Chapman

Friday, 12 September 2003

• Contribution on Transaction Requirements from Choreology Fletcher, Tony
• RE: BurdettML Burdett, David

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• RE: Web Services Choreography Description Language (WS-CDL) propo sal Burdett, David
• Re: Web Services Choreography Description Language (WS-CDL) proposal Steve Ross-Talbot
• BurdettML Yaron Goland

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

• Web Services Choreography Description Language (WS-CDL) proposal Nickolas Kavantzas
• Re: The requirements on message 'correllation' Haugen Robert

Tuesday, 9 September 2003

• Re: [ws-chor]: Reqts 1.0 Comments -preconditions and postconditions Monika Solanki
• WARNING: Potential virus sent by you! Alert.Notification@ivisgroup.com

Monday, 8 September 2003

• Re: Correlation Requirements Francis McCabe
• Re: Choreography awareness (was RE: Correlation Requirements) Francis McCabe
• RE: [ws-chor]: Reqts 1.0 Comments -preconditions and postconditions Martin Chapman
• [ws-chor]: Reqts 1.0 Comments -preconditions and postconditions Monika Solanki
• Correlation and the need for causality Andrew Berry
• Re: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Andrew Berry
• Re: The requirements on message 'correllation' Andrew Berry

Sunday, 7 September 2003

• Re: Correlation Requirements Monica Martin
• RE: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Ricky Ho

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• Choreography awareness (was RE: Correlation Requirements) Martin Chapman

Friday, 5 September 2003

• RE: Correlation Requirements Burdett, David
• RE: Correlation Requirements Burdett, David
• Re: Correlation Requirements Jon Dart
• Re: Correlation Requirements Francis McCabe
• Re: The requirements on message 'correllation' Assaf Arkin

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• RE: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Tony Fletcher
• RE: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Ugo Corda
• RE: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Burdett, David
• Re: Correlation Requirements Monica Martin
• Re: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Steve Ross-Talbot
• Re: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Ugo Corda
• RE: Correlation Requirements Burdett, David
• Body vs Header Correlation - which is best? Burdett, David

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• RE: The requirements on message 'correllation' Burdett, David
• RE: The requirements on message 'correllation' Cummins, Fred A
• Re: The requirements on message 'correllation' Jon Dart
• Ongoing Regrets Lipton, Paul C
• The requirements on message 'correllation' Fletcher, Tony
• [ws-chor-Task Force 2] 9/2/2003: Comparison of Task Force 2 and Reqts Document Categories Monica Martin

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• Re: DRAFT agenda for 2nd Sept 2003 Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
• Guilty? You Decide! Famous Trials Theater

Monday, 1 September 2003

• DRAFT agenda for 2nd Sept 2003 Steve Ross-Talbot

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 16:17:00 UTC