W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > September 2003

RE: Re-submission of Requirements on Transactions

From: Fletcher, Tony <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:15:58 +0100
Message-ID: <221369570DEDF346AE42821041345E89264FC2@exchange1.corp.choreology.com>
To: "Monica Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>, <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

Dear Monica and Daniel,

Yes of course all the requirements are still under discussion.  Just to
note, however, that we all ready have a long standing section in the
Requirements document entitled 'Transaction (currently section 4.10),
and that the idea of a 'transaction', one definition of which is 'a unit
of work', is a pretty fundamental notion in any concept of choreography,
whether it be B2B, B2C, internal integration or whatever.  So no
expansion of scope over what it needs to be.

Best Regards     Tony
A M Fletcher
Cohesions  (TM)
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ     UK
Tel: +44 (0) 870 7390076   Fax: +44 (0) 870 7390077  Mobile: +44 (0)
7801 948219
tony.fletcher@choreology.com     (Home: amfletcher@iee.org)

-----Original Message-----
From: Monica Martin [mailto:monica.martin@sun.com] 
Sent: 29 September 2003 17:25
To: Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
Cc: Fletcher, Tony; public-ws-chor@w3.org; public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: Re-submission of Requirements on Transactions

Daniel_Austin@grainger.com wrote:

>Hi Tony,
>    Your erstwhile editors thank you for this. We will definitely add 
>this to our next editing session as input material. Thanks again!
mm1: Thanks, Tony. Given that this may extend our scope of choreography,

would we discuss these requirements prior to their inclusion (may apply 
to several sets of functions, of which your submission is only one).
Comments everyone?
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 07:16:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:12 UTC