public-ws-addressing@w3.org from September 2005 by date

Friday, 30 September 2005

• New Issue: UsingAddressing with other bindings than our SOAP binding. Jonathan Marsh
• NEW ISSUE: When, if ever, MUST action be used for dispatch? David Hull
• Re: wsa:Action for undefined faults Tom Rutt
• wsa:Action for undefined faults Pete Hendry

Thursday, 29 September 2005

• Re: Reference Parameters - using them Pete Hendry
• CR ISSUE : Generating non-reply messages Glen Daniels
• RE: Advice needed on WSDL LC issue LC301, granularity of SOAP action. Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Reworking of HTTP serializations following F2F Hugo Haas
• Reworking of HTTP serializations following F2F Hugo Haas
• Binding WSDL to (refactored) SOAP David Hull
• proposals for meps and bindings including one-way David Orchard
• "Proposal DH2" David Hull
• Re: Reference Parameters - using them Marc Hadley
• Re: Reference Parameters - using them Pete Hendry
• Re: Reference Parameters - using them Conor P. Cahill
• Re: Reference Parameters - using them Marc Hadley

Wednesday, 28 September 2005

• Reference Parameters - using them Pete Hendry
• i057 proposals David Orchard
• CR Issue (SOAP binding): Mapping of headers to MAPs and "WSA is engaged" David Hull

Tuesday, 27 September 2005

• Action item for [i061] Francisco Curbera
• Test Suites and Implementation Reports from other WGs paul.downey@bt.com
• Action 2005-09-12 i056 Yalcinalp, Umit

Friday, 23 September 2005

• Thoughts on Testable Features Mark Nottingham
• Agenda: 2005-09-28 F2F, Palo Alto, CA, US Mark Nottingham
• Re: New Issue: Migration of @Action from WS-A 200408 to WS-A 1.0 [i064] Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 22 September 2005

• Charter Requirements for the WSDL Binding Mark Nottingham
• Re: ID-typed attribute on WS-Addressing EPRs? John Kemp
• RE: ID-typed attribute on WS-Addressing EPRs? Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 21 September 2005

• RE: ID-typed attribute on WS-Addressing EPRs? Jonathan Marsh
• FW: LC305: notational conventions proposal Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 20 September 2005

• Minutes of the 2005-09-19 teleconference Mark Nottingham

Monday, 19 September 2005

• Re: XMLP request for requirements Mark Nottingham
• Re: FW: New Issue: SOAP Binding CR ([Details] for wsa:ActionMismatch Subsubcode) Hugo Haas

Friday, 16 September 2005

• Action: Review of WSDL SOAP 1.1 binding LC WD, along with the SOAP binding in the Adjuncts. Katy Warr

Thursday, 15 September 2005

• Another proposal for asynchronous support in SOAP and WSDL Marc Hadley

Tuesday, 13 September 2005

• XMLP request for requirements michael.mahan@nokia.com
• Issue i056 - which messages does the proposal apply to Anish Karmarkar
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-09-19 Mark Nottingham
• Minutes of the 2005-09-12 teleconference Mark Nottingham

Monday, 12 September 2005

• Re: Review of WSDL core for WSA David Hull
• Issue i020, subissue (c) revised proposal Anish Karmarkar
• RE: Review of WSDL core for WSA Jonathan Marsh
• Question from WSN: wsa: namespace URI David Hull
• Greetings Mike Vernal

Sunday, 11 September 2005

• Review of WSDL core for WSA David Hull

Friday, 9 September 2005

• Comments on WSDL adjuncts part 2 Marc Goodner
• Agenda: 2005-09-28 F2F, Palo Alto, CA, US [DRAFT] Mark Nottingham
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-09-12 Mark Nottingham
• enumerated list of concrete message exchanges paul.downey@bt.com

Wednesday, 7 September 2005

• Comments on the WSDL 2.0 Primer Rogers, Tony

Tuesday, 6 September 2005

• Re: wsa:To -> SOAP1.2's ImmediateDestination Rich Salz

Monday, 5 September 2005

• Re: wsa:To -> SOAP1.2's ImmediateDestination Mark Baker
• Re: wsa:To -> SOAP1.2's ImmediateDestination Rich Salz

Sunday, 4 September 2005

• Re: wsa:To -> SOAP1.2's ImmediateDestination Mark Baker

Friday, 2 September 2005

• RE: [i061] WSA WSDL Binding Issue (Action without UsingAddressing) Jonathan Marsh
• RE: List of testable features paul.downey@bt.com
• Advice needed on WSDL LC issue LC301, granularity of SOAP action. Jonathan Marsh

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2005 17:03:53 UTC