- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:13:31 -0500
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
+1 On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:37:07PM -0000, Jim Webber wrote: > > Tom: > > > Well, what if the publisher of the epr wants to but the > > actual http url as the wsa:to address. How is this usage > > distinguished by the more abstract "logical" address use case > > you are championing. > > Why isn't a http URL logical? It is a logical address that happens to be > resolved by an application-specific combination of DNS lookup and Web > Server at message transfer time. Savas' prior example of using a URN to > address a service hosted on a P2P network is no different really. > > > Perhaps we need a "choice" element to distinguish the two use cases. > > There will be many epr > > publishers which want to put a url to direct the http request > > to in the wsa:to field. > > I don't agree. All addresses are logical (Paul Downey has a good blog > post which alludes to this: > http://blog.whatfettle.com/archives/000244.html). > > Jim > -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 03:55:36 UTC