RE: Thoughts on TAG issue EndpointsRef47 from paul.downey@bt.com on 2005-02-09 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from February 2005)

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:17:28 -0000
To: <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, <tom@coastin.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DFD5@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>

Savas wrote:

> What if the original sender decided to use a pigeon to transfer this
> SOAP message to an intermediary? Does it really have to use HTTP? Should
> WS-Addressing define the semantics on how a SOAP message is transported?

i'd like to make it clear that whilst BT probably holds an extensive IP
portfolio on tranmsission over avion carrier, i actually had something 
more reliable in mind: JMS, MQ, etc :-)

Paul

Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 08:16:23 UTC