- From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:37:07 -0000
- To: <tom@coastin.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Tom: > Well, what if the publisher of the epr wants to but the > actual http url as the wsa:to address. How is this usage > distinguished by the more abstract "logical" address use case > you are championing. Why isn't a http URL logical? It is a logical address that happens to be resolved by an application-specific combination of DNS lookup and Web Server at message transfer time. Savas' prior example of using a URN to address a service hosted on a P2P network is no different really. > Perhaps we need a "choice" element to distinguish the two use cases. > There will be many epr > publishers which want to put a url to direct the http request > to in the wsa:to field. I don't agree. All addresses are logical (Paul Downey has a good blog post which alludes to this: http://blog.whatfettle.com/archives/000244.html). Jim
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 23:37:24 UTC