Re: NEW ISSUE; wsa:To interaction with application protocols

> Or whether it makes sense to say that omission of a <wsa:To> is
> equivalent to including one with the well know 'anonymous' URI as its
> value.

How about the empty element, <was:To/>?  It's a lot less confusing to see
a signed empty element then it is to recognize that an added element
isn't covered by the appropriate signature.
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology
XS40 XML Security Gateway
XML Security Overview

Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 02:09:35 UTC