- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:09:30 -0500 (EST)
- To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "paul.downey@bt.com" <paul.downey@bt.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> Or whether it makes sense to say that omission of a <wsa:To> is > equivalent to including one with the well know 'anonymous' URI as its > value. How about the empty element, <was:To/>? It's a lot less confusing to see a signed empty element then it is to recognize that an added element isn't covered by the appropriate signature. /r$ -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 02:09:35 UTC