- From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:04:58 -0500
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "paul.downey@bt.com" <paul.downey@bt.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
On Dec 16, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Rich Salz wrote: >> Or whether it makes sense to say that omission of a <wsa:To> is >> equivalent to including one with the well know 'anonymous' URI as its >> value. > > How about the empty element, <was:To/>? It's a lot less confusing to > see > a signed empty element then it is to recognize that an added element > isn't covered by the appropriate signature. Works for me. Marc. --- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 18:05:05 UTC