- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:42:21 -0000
- To: <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
if this is to be subsumed by i006 then the title should be updated to "Transport Independence" or some such and/or the description updated. All assuming MarcH as the issue's owner is happy with this. Paul -----Original Message----- From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] Sent: 13 December 2004 20:12 To: Downey,PS,Paul,XSJ67A C Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE; wsa:To interaction with application protocols Hey Paul. On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:43:38PM -0000, paul.downey@bt.com wrote: > Hi Mark! > > i think this is closely related to issue 6 "Message Property Optionality": > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i006 Good catch! > AIUI you'd like an addressing xxTo: value to map to an populate a transport > xxTo: value, whereas Marc is suggesting that a missing addressing xxTo: > could default to to a value derrived from the transport. s/transport/transfer/, but yah, exactly. > i guess both issues raise an issue with the way the spec is structured given > that the SOAP and WSDL bindings are thus far "transport-neutral". Definitely. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 13:41:35 UTC