Re: Wiki update (Re: stats api webidl implementers feedback)

On 10/24/2013 07:12 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote:
> Great thanks! - long long for bytes makes sense. I can still get it in
> for FF27 (Monday).
>
> A couple of nits:
> >     DOMHiResTimeStamp timestamp;
>
> I think you mean DOMHighResTimeStamp right?

Yep.

>
> >   unsigned long firs;
>
> I'm not sure what this is.

FIR - Full Intra Request - an RTCP control message. Scanning RFCs, it
seems that it's only defined for H.261, but the traces are confusing.
>
> .: Jan-Ivar :.
>
> On 10/24/13 2:21 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> I've updated http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/Stats with most of
>> the suggestions, and a few other fiddles. It should also be easy
>> (easier?) now to generate WebIDL from the source; just take the
>> content of all the <pre> sections.
>>
>> I also made all the byte counters "long long"; we've found that
>> 32-bit byte counters overflow rapidly.
>>
>> Thanks very much for the feedback!
>


-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.