Re: Wiki update (Re: stats api webidl implementers feedback)

Great thanks! - long long for bytes makes sense. I can still get it in 
for FF27 (Monday).

A couple of nits:
 >     DOMHiResTimeStamp timestamp;

I think you mean DOMHighResTimeStamp right?

 >   unsigned long firs;

I'm not sure what this is.

.: Jan-Ivar :.

On 10/24/13 2:21 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> I've updated http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/Stats with most of 
> the suggestions, and a few other fiddles. It should also be easy 
> (easier?) now to generate WebIDL from the source; just take the 
> content of all the <pre> sections.
>
> I also made all the byte counters "long long"; we've found that 32-bit 
> byte counters overflow rapidly.
>
> Thanks very much for the feedback!