- From: Robert Wolff (GoCast) <rwolff@gocast.it>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:17:57 -0800
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, public-webrtc@w3.org
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 19:18:27 UTC
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > > >>> I agree Justin. We've been playing with various options within the audio >> options lately and believe exposing these is important. Trying to keep an >> interface simple is great, but the functionality buried in webrtc is great >> and very useful. I'd love to see some optionally usable knobs and levers >> here. > > > Bob, what options do you have in mind? > > To be clear, I'm not advocating for more knobs and levers, but simply > recognizing that we will end up with more, and therefore we should plan > accordingly. > > Justin - I'm not currently advocating any new options above what is provided in the webrtc C++ APIs. I'm simply noting that we have found the existing options at that level very useful and would like to see them exposed - not for the sake of having more complexity, but for the sake of control in more advanced applications. -- Bob Wolff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GoCast - Video broadcasting on the go! www.GoCast.it <http://www.GoCast.it%20>
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 19:18:27 UTC