Re: Agenda, June 25 2015

On 25/06/15 17:22, Erik Lagerway wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com
> <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
>     Present: Adam, Dan, Erik, Peter, Stefan
>
>     First: Welcome to Erik!!
>
>
> Thanks Stefan!
>
>
>
>     Process: we should add a label saying something like "waiting for input
>     from proposer" or something similar, because a lot of the PRs and Issues
>     are waiting for input.
>
>
> Would it also be helpful that all issues and PRs that are not currently
> assigned, be assigned to someone? Not trying to be cheeky here, sincere
> question :)

It would - we usually do better in doing that than we did today.

>
>
>     On 24/06/15 17:21, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>     > First off: I won't be there.
>     > Turns out I'm sitting on a plane while you're talking. Stuff happens. Sorry.
>     >
>     > Highest priority for the week: Getting out a new getusermedia draft, so
>     > that Dom can send out the Last Call responses we have prepared (the ones
>     > that are ready, that is).
>
>     Let's go ahead and release a new editors draft. Complete set of changes
>     for fixing errors will take some time, so let's release without that,
>     and soon follow up with the error stuff.
>
>     Adam will merge #171 with a Note saying this is the first iteration, and
>     we'll review over weekend (including Cullen), and release a dated
>     version Monday.
>
>     Adam creates the dated version Monday if we're OK.
>
>     >
>     > Media capture and streams
>     > -------------------------------------
>     > Pull requests:
>     > - #171 referring to HTML 5.1 - suggest this is Good Enough now.
>
>     Let's put it in, but make it clear that there is work to be done in a
>     note. Adam to merge and add the note (see above).
>
>     > - #181 Remove text about firing event handles - Adam, is it important
>     > enough that we should do this after #194 is done, but before the new
>     > editors' draft?
>
>     Let's wait for the error stuff to land. Perhaps split this PR into two
>     to not depend on other stuff.
>
>     > - #194 Overconstrainederror - suggest we merge. Only Domenic is capable
>     > of reviewing this at the moment (just about).
>
>     Let's merge this (after we get the dated one out) and ask for comments.
>     Stefan to make a comment in the PR and ask Dominic and Allen to review.
>
>
>     #199: Adam has commented. Ended event use MediaSteamErrorEvent
>     structure, but what to if we remove it? We should not combine the two
>     things, ended event should not be shared with addTrack/removeTrack
>     event. Dan to rewrite (perhaps make a new PR).
>
>     #200: Merged.
>
>     >
>     >
>     > Issues:
>     > - #118 Practical algorithm - Cullen reopened it. I asked him to take it
>     > to the list. No action yet.
>     > - #127 lack of timeout - still icebox
>     > - #161 Remove direct assigment - see PR #171
>     To be closed by Adam once merged #171
>     > - #162 MediaStreamError - see PR #194
>     In progress
>     > - # 176 constrainable pattern shold pass an IDL validator - Adam?
>     In progress, Adam looking into this.
>     > - #189 getUserMedia({}) should be a TypeError
>     More discussion needed - Adam to respond to Jan-Ivar's list mail
>     > - #191 Support zoom - No
>     Stefan will comment and close Issue.
>     > - #192 Support setting focus - No
>     Stefan will comment "make an extension spec"
>     > - #193 Adaptive frame rate
>     > - #196 Spec not tamper proof
>     Closed - fixed by PR
>     > - #197 Channel count - NOTE: IPR issue, specific proposal from
>     > non-WG-member. Suggest ask proposer to join (simplest).
>     > - #198 Capabilities discovery via EnumerateDevices() - as above.
>
>     #201 Needs input from list
>
>     >
>     > Webrtc-PC
>     > --------------
>     > Pull requests: 11
>     >
>     > Many of these have the problem of proposer not responding.
>     >
>     > - #29 mediadiscarded
>
>     Peter has reviewed current state now, will work on it.
>
>      > - #229 Removing optionality
>
>     Merged already.
>
>     > - #235 Modernize getStats - I think this is OK
>
>     Merged.
>
>     > - #236 Replace operations array with chain - Adam?
>
>     Adam not happy with the language that is not harmonized with resp of
>     document. In progress, more work needed e.g. when type checking is done.
>
>     > - #237 ReplaceTrack with open issue
>
>     No update from Jan-Ivar.
>
>     > - #238 Use HTTPS - think we should merge this, or close and do
>     > search/replace (no response to whitespace complaint)
>
>     Assigned to Peter.
>
>     > - #239 tidy target - Adam/Dan, is this useful?
>
>     Merged.
>
>     > - #240 Move certificate management section - sure, why not?
>
>     Assigned to Peter.
>
>     > - #241 Lots of goodies (DTLStransport, ICEtransport)
>
>     More discussion needed.
>
>     > - #242 Remove syntax error - dom is most often right
>
>     Needs discussion.
>
>     > - #243 Mark candidate property required - overlap with #229?
>
>     Merged.
>
>      >
>      > Bugs: 32
>
>     Did not get there.
>
>     >
>     > We really need to define the icebox for non-1.0 items.... if we have
>     > time, should we instead discuss how to get 1.0 and "the next version" split?
>
>     Hopefully with a "next version" on the radar screen it will be easier to
>     close 1.0.
>
>      >
>      > (Since I won't be there, leaving decision to my co-chairs)
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 16:24:25 UTC