Re: Agenda, June 25 2015

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Present: Adam, Dan, Erik, Peter, Stefan
>
> First: Welcome to Erik!!
>

Thanks Stefan!


>
>
> Process: we should add a label saying something like "waiting for input
> from proposer" or something similar, because a lot of the PRs and Issues
> are waiting for input.
>

Would it also be helpful that all issues and PRs that are not currently
assigned, be assigned to someone? Not trying to be cheeky here, sincere
question :)


>
> On 24/06/15 17:21, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> > First off: I won't be there.
> > Turns out I'm sitting on a plane while you're talking. Stuff happens.
> Sorry.
> >
> > Highest priority for the week: Getting out a new getusermedia draft, so
> > that Dom can send out the Last Call responses we have prepared (the ones
> > that are ready, that is).
>
> Let's go ahead and release a new editors draft. Complete set of changes
> for fixing errors will take some time, so let's release without that,
> and soon follow up with the error stuff.
>
> Adam will merge #171 with a Note saying this is the first iteration, and
> we'll review over weekend (including Cullen), and release a dated
> version Monday.
>
> Adam creates the dated version Monday if we're OK.
>
> >
> > Media capture and streams
> > -------------------------------------
> > Pull requests:
> > - #171 referring to HTML 5.1 - suggest this is Good Enough now.
>
> Let's put it in, but make it clear that there is work to be done in a
> note. Adam to merge and add the note (see above).
>
> > - #181 Remove text about firing event handles - Adam, is it important
> > enough that we should do this after #194 is done, but before the new
> > editors' draft?
>
> Let's wait for the error stuff to land. Perhaps split this PR into two
> to not depend on other stuff.
>
> > - #194 Overconstrainederror - suggest we merge. Only Domenic is capable
> > of reviewing this at the moment (just about).
>
> Let's merge this (after we get the dated one out) and ask for comments.
> Stefan to make a comment in the PR and ask Dominic and Allen to review.
>
>
> #199: Adam has commented. Ended event use MediaSteamErrorEvent
> structure, but what to if we remove it? We should not combine the two
> things, ended event should not be shared with addTrack/removeTrack
> event. Dan to rewrite (perhaps make a new PR).
>
> #200: Merged.
>
> >
> >
> > Issues:
> > - #118 Practical algorithm - Cullen reopened it. I asked him to take it
> > to the list. No action yet.
> > - #127 lack of timeout - still icebox
> > - #161 Remove direct assigment - see PR #171
> To be closed by Adam once merged #171
> > - #162 MediaStreamError - see PR #194
> In progress
> > - # 176 constrainable pattern shold pass an IDL validator - Adam?
> In progress, Adam looking into this.
> > - #189 getUserMedia({}) should be a TypeError
> More discussion needed - Adam to respond to Jan-Ivar's list mail
> > - #191 Support zoom - No
> Stefan will comment and close Issue.
> > - #192 Support setting focus - No
> Stefan will comment "make an extension spec"
> > - #193 Adaptive frame rate
> > - #196 Spec not tamper proof
> Closed - fixed by PR
> > - #197 Channel count - NOTE: IPR issue, specific proposal from
> > non-WG-member. Suggest ask proposer to join (simplest).
> > - #198 Capabilities discovery via EnumerateDevices() - as above.
>
> #201 Needs input from list
>
> >
> > Webrtc-PC
> > --------------
> > Pull requests: 11
> >
> > Many of these have the problem of proposer not responding.
> >
> > - #29 mediadiscarded
>
> Peter has reviewed current state now, will work on it.
>
> > - #229 Removing optionality
>
> Merged already.
>
> > - #235 Modernize getStats - I think this is OK
>
> Merged.
>
> > - #236 Replace operations array with chain - Adam?
>
> Adam not happy with the language that is not harmonized with resp of
> document. In progress, more work needed e.g. when type checking is done.
>
> > - #237 ReplaceTrack with open issue
>
> No update from Jan-Ivar.
>
> > - #238 Use HTTPS - think we should merge this, or close and do
> > search/replace (no response to whitespace complaint)
>
> Assigned to Peter.
>
> > - #239 tidy target - Adam/Dan, is this useful?
>
> Merged.
>
> > - #240 Move certificate management section - sure, why not?
>
> Assigned to Peter.
>
> > - #241 Lots of goodies (DTLStransport, ICEtransport)
>
> More discussion needed.
>
> > - #242 Remove syntax error - dom is most often right
>
> Needs discussion.
>
> > - #243 Mark candidate property required - overlap with #229?
>
> Merged.
>
> >
> > Bugs: 32
>
> Did not get there.
>
> >
> > We really need to define the icebox for non-1.0 items.... if we have
> > time, should we instead discuss how to get 1.0 and "the next version"
> split?
>
> Hopefully with a "next version" on the radar screen it will be easier to
> close 1.0.
>
> >
> > (Since I won't be there, leaving decision to my co-chairs)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>