Re: Agenda, June 25 2015

Ah ok, wasn't sure if it was deliberate or not considering the nature of
democratic-ish processes in the W3C.

Thanks for the clarification.


On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> On 25/06/15 17:22, Erik Lagerway wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com
> > <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Present: Adam, Dan, Erik, Peter, Stefan
> >
> >     First: Welcome to Erik!!
> >
> >
> > Thanks Stefan!
> >
> >
> >
> >     Process: we should add a label saying something like "waiting for
> input
> >     from proposer" or something similar, because a lot of the PRs and
> Issues
> >     are waiting for input.
> >
> >
> > Would it also be helpful that all issues and PRs that are not currently
> > assigned, be assigned to someone? Not trying to be cheeky here, sincere
> > question :)
>
> It would - we usually do better in doing that than we did today.
>
> >
> >
> >     On 24/06/15 17:21, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> >     > First off: I won't be there.
> >     > Turns out I'm sitting on a plane while you're talking. Stuff
> happens. Sorry.
> >     >
> >     > Highest priority for the week: Getting out a new getusermedia
> draft, so
> >     > that Dom can send out the Last Call responses we have prepared
> (the ones
> >     > that are ready, that is).
> >
> >     Let's go ahead and release a new editors draft. Complete set of
> changes
> >     for fixing errors will take some time, so let's release without that,
> >     and soon follow up with the error stuff.
> >
> >     Adam will merge #171 with a Note saying this is the first iteration,
> and
> >     we'll review over weekend (including Cullen), and release a dated
> >     version Monday.
> >
> >     Adam creates the dated version Monday if we're OK.
> >
> >     >
> >     > Media capture and streams
> >     > -------------------------------------
> >     > Pull requests:
> >     > - #171 referring to HTML 5.1 - suggest this is Good Enough now.
> >
> >     Let's put it in, but make it clear that there is work to be done in a
> >     note. Adam to merge and add the note (see above).
> >
> >     > - #181 Remove text about firing event handles - Adam, is it
> important
> >     > enough that we should do this after #194 is done, but before the
> new
> >     > editors' draft?
> >
> >     Let's wait for the error stuff to land. Perhaps split this PR into
> two
> >     to not depend on other stuff.
> >
> >     > - #194 Overconstrainederror - suggest we merge. Only Domenic is
> capable
> >     > of reviewing this at the moment (just about).
> >
> >     Let's merge this (after we get the dated one out) and ask for
> comments.
> >     Stefan to make a comment in the PR and ask Dominic and Allen to
> review.
> >
> >
> >     #199: Adam has commented. Ended event use MediaSteamErrorEvent
> >     structure, but what to if we remove it? We should not combine the two
> >     things, ended event should not be shared with addTrack/removeTrack
> >     event. Dan to rewrite (perhaps make a new PR).
> >
> >     #200: Merged.
> >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Issues:
> >     > - #118 Practical algorithm - Cullen reopened it. I asked him to
> take it
> >     > to the list. No action yet.
> >     > - #127 lack of timeout - still icebox
> >     > - #161 Remove direct assigment - see PR #171
> >     To be closed by Adam once merged #171
> >     > - #162 MediaStreamError - see PR #194
> >     In progress
> >     > - # 176 constrainable pattern shold pass an IDL validator - Adam?
> >     In progress, Adam looking into this.
> >     > - #189 getUserMedia({}) should be a TypeError
> >     More discussion needed - Adam to respond to Jan-Ivar's list mail
> >     > - #191 Support zoom - No
> >     Stefan will comment and close Issue.
> >     > - #192 Support setting focus - No
> >     Stefan will comment "make an extension spec"
> >     > - #193 Adaptive frame rate
> >     > - #196 Spec not tamper proof
> >     Closed - fixed by PR
> >     > - #197 Channel count - NOTE: IPR issue, specific proposal from
> >     > non-WG-member. Suggest ask proposer to join (simplest).
> >     > - #198 Capabilities discovery via EnumerateDevices() - as above.
> >
> >     #201 Needs input from list
> >
> >     >
> >     > Webrtc-PC
> >     > --------------
> >     > Pull requests: 11
> >     >
> >     > Many of these have the problem of proposer not responding.
> >     >
> >     > - #29 mediadiscarded
> >
> >     Peter has reviewed current state now, will work on it.
> >
> >      > - #229 Removing optionality
> >
> >     Merged already.
> >
> >     > - #235 Modernize getStats - I think this is OK
> >
> >     Merged.
> >
> >     > - #236 Replace operations array with chain - Adam?
> >
> >     Adam not happy with the language that is not harmonized with resp of
> >     document. In progress, more work needed e.g. when type checking is
> done.
> >
> >     > - #237 ReplaceTrack with open issue
> >
> >     No update from Jan-Ivar.
> >
> >     > - #238 Use HTTPS - think we should merge this, or close and do
> >     > search/replace (no response to whitespace complaint)
> >
> >     Assigned to Peter.
> >
> >     > - #239 tidy target - Adam/Dan, is this useful?
> >
> >     Merged.
> >
> >     > - #240 Move certificate management section - sure, why not?
> >
> >     Assigned to Peter.
> >
> >     > - #241 Lots of goodies (DTLStransport, ICEtransport)
> >
> >     More discussion needed.
> >
> >     > - #242 Remove syntax error - dom is most often right
> >
> >     Needs discussion.
> >
> >     > - #243 Mark candidate property required - overlap with #229?
> >
> >     Merged.
> >
> >      >
> >      > Bugs: 32
> >
> >     Did not get there.
> >
> >     >
> >     > We really need to define the icebox for non-1.0 items.... if we
> have
> >     > time, should we instead discuss how to get 1.0 and "the next
> version" split?
> >
> >     Hopefully with a "next version" on the radar screen it will be
> easier to
> >     close 1.0.
> >
> >      >
> >      > (Since I won't be there, leaving decision to my co-chairs)
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >      >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 16:48:33 UTC