- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:14:30 +0200
- To: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>, Eliezer Bernart <eliezer.bernart@gmail.com>, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_Kik1bJMOHg_=6N4Rq1ffp_jAed-1TvZXA4h2F1ORBL4w@mail.gmail.com>
I second Eliot. Thank you very much! ☆*PhistucK* On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>wrote: > Hi Max & Phistuck. > > > > This is really great. I totally appreciate all of your effort. Two > questions: > > > > Can this be done _*after*_ the pages are created and people start using > them? > > If not, how long do you think this will take? > > > > My thoughts are that it’s adequate for people to use the content and—if > necessary to see the source—navigate the TOC on MSDN. If it will take weeks > longer to directly attribute the content, I’d vote for getting the content > out there with the top-level reference. Also, if it will take an exorbitant > amount of your time, I’d say you’ve done enough already. On the other hand, > if this is something you can take care of in a little bit of time and you > feel generous enough to donate that, it would be helpful. > > > > Theoretically, this could also be done by hand, by WPW volunteers who are > verifying the accuracy of the migration. > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > Eliot > > > > *From:* Max Polk [mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, January 25, 2014 2:22 PM > *To:* Eliot Graff; PhistucK > *Cc:* Eliezer Bernart; Julee Burdekin; Doug Schepers; Renoir Boulanger; > WebPlatform Public List > > *Subject:* Re: Attribution to MSDN on JavaScript pages > > > > PhistucK wrote: > > >>Adding the actual original article link is way better for imported > content. If it is possible, I strongly prefer it. > > > Eliot wrote: > > Unfortunately, I do not know if the URL for each data has been > preserved and can readily be imported (I don’t think they were; that was > the reason that the HTML, CSS, and other pages Microsoft donated point to > the Internet Explorer API Reference page).Hi Phistuck. > > > I discovered a scheme to obtain all the original urls for the JavaScript > reference pages, but it will take a bit of time to get it to work just > right. Basically you have to do what the browser is doing when you click > to expand the sections, except you do it from a script that pretends to > expand each section one at a time, iterating and recursing over all the > sections until there are no more children. Then you map the titles and > urls back to the page names we are using and correct the attribution > section. A somewhat larger effort but if it's good information maybe it's > worth it. >
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 08:15:41 UTC