W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > October 2013

Re: A few properties that may need re-prioritizing

From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:07:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPwaZpXW7kgAsxt4X81g5W-2ijzYHj=TDfMns1OJfCVPs+sn9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Other than background-position-x and background-position-y, I'm surprised
that those pages are so popular on Opera. However, given that we know
they're popular (unless we have some reason to doubt those stats), it seems
to make sense to add them to the list.


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi, Folks:
>
> I've been trying to finalize the master list so I can post status. (We're
> so close!) I will send a long list of properties we will not be doing, so
> folks can review it.
>
> But just now, I compared the full list to the most popular properties
> listed on the Opera site.[1] And I did come up with a few properties that
> seem to be popular:
>
>  * background-position-x
>  * background-position-y
>  * ime-mode
>  * layout-flow
>  * speak
>  * text-justify-trim
>  * text-kashida-space
>  * user-select
>
> Should we up the priority on these and get them done?
>
> What do you think?
>
> Julee
> [1] http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/599/cssproplist-url.htm
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 00:08:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:54 UTC