We can cross-check with Chromestatus [1] to see if the results are any different. [1] http://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/css/popularity Also, background-position-x|y are not spec'd, and there hasn't been any discussion about it since last year. ~Scott On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>wrote: > Other than background-position-x and background-position-y, I'm surprised > that those pages are so popular on Opera. However, given that we know > they're popular (unless we have some reason to doubt those stats), it seems > to make sense to add them to the list. > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Folks: >> >> I've been trying to finalize the master list so I can post status. (We're >> so close!) I will send a long list of properties we will not be doing, so >> folks can review it. >> >> But just now, I compared the full list to the most popular properties >> listed on the Opera site.[1] And I did come up with a few properties that >> seem to be popular: >> >> * background-position-x >> * background-position-y >> * ime-mode >> * layout-flow >> * speak >> * text-justify-trim >> * text-kashida-space >> * user-select >> >> Should we up the priority on these and get them done? >> >> What do you think? >> >> Julee >> [1] http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/599/cssproplist-url.htm >> ---------------------------- >> julee@adobe.com >> @adobejulee >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 00:16:23 UTC