W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > October 2013

Re: A few properties that may need re-prioritizing

From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:15:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHZLcPp+RBpC2=Q7KD=4BNNMQ2hVJc89yiazrw36mvMDTCFqoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
Cc: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
We can cross-check with Chromestatus [1] to see if the results are any
different.

[1] http://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/css/popularity

Also, background-position-x|y are not spec'd, and there hasn't been any
discussion about it since last year.

~Scott



On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>wrote:

> Other than background-position-x and background-position-y, I'm surprised
> that those pages are so popular on Opera. However, given that we know
> they're popular (unless we have some reason to doubt those stats), it seems
> to make sense to add them to the list.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Folks:
>>
>> I've been trying to finalize the master list so I can post status. (We're
>> so close!) I will send a long list of properties we will not be doing, so
>> folks can review it.
>>
>> But just now, I compared the full list to the most popular properties
>> listed on the Opera site.[1] And I did come up with a few properties that
>> seem to be popular:
>>
>>  * background-position-x
>>  * background-position-y
>>  * ime-mode
>>  * layout-flow
>>  * speak
>>  * text-justify-trim
>>  * text-kashida-space
>>  * user-select
>>
>> Should we up the priority on these and get them done?
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Julee
>> [1] http://devfiles.myopera.com/articles/599/cssproplist-url.htm
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 00:16:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:54 UTC