Re: JS content plan

use strict is a standard ECMAScript 5 (and later) feature, it should not be
dropped.

I do not think Array/Array.isArray is a good way reflect that as well. This
is simply incorrect and inconsistent.


☆*PhistucK*


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Removed Internet Explorer only pages:
>
>     removed   ActiveXObject-Object.wiki
>     removed   Enumerator-Object.wiki
>     removed   VBArray-Object.wiki
>     removed   atEnd-Method__Enumerator.wiki
>     removed   cc_on-Statement.wiki
>     removed   getVarDate-Method__Date.wiki
>     removed   if-Statement.wiki
>     removed   item-Method__Enumerator.wiki
>     removed   moveFirst-Method__Enumerator.wiki
>     removed   moveNext-Method__Enumerator.wiki
>     removed   set-Statement.wiki
>     removed   WinRTError-Object.wiki
>     removed   use-strict-Directive.wiki
>     removed   JavaScript-Directives.wiki
>
> Removed " Function" and " Method" suffixes.  However, do note that we
> still differentiate page names for static class functions versus
> instance methods this way:
>
>     Array/Array.isArray
>     Array/concat
>
> Fixed page content (conversion didn't work well):
>
>     JavaScript-Future-Reserved-Words.wiki
>
> Commits visible at:
>
>     https://github.com/maxpolk/msdn-js-conversion/tree/master/round-alice
>
> Page names are the right column in the upload-mapping.wiki page.
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:11 PM, PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am stongly against the suffixes...
>> I keep seeing pages that are non standard...
>>
>